A item is frequently only appreciated when it is absent. In the case of the Asia Cup, this pattern is reversed, instead of occurring before or after the event, appreciation occurs during it.
The Asia Cup does not receive a thorough pre-tournament tour or a protracted countdown from websites like ESPNcricinfo, in contrast to larger tournaments. There aren’t any critical analyses of schedule conflicts and ticket availability. Every time the Asia Cup starts as a result, people are consistently taken by surprise. It even appears to compete with the World Cup’s status on occasion. Here are a few explanations as to why this could be the case:
Teams with longstanding rivalries will compete in the Asia Cup. These games have additional levels of significance due to their geographic proximity, common cultural heritage, connected history, and complex political relations. The cricket games between these sides are exciting to watch since they feature friendly rivalry as well as tense moments.
The contest features fierce rivalry that occasionally verge on hatred. Fans’ perspectives have been influenced by the history of these clubs playing against one another, and if their favourite rivalry isn’t taking place, they will fervently support their team’s rivals. This dynamic makes for an intriguing setting for games, perhaps even ones like Bangladesh vs. Sri Lanka.
The tournament’s structure is intended to guarantee that a crucial rivalry in Asia is represented. Teams compete against one another three times in this arrangement, which benefits the Asian Cricket Council financially. Interestingly, despite this setup, there has never been an India-Pakistan final, defying assumptions based on capitalism.
Shift in Cricket Ethos:
The cricketing culture might occasionally change as a result of the Asia Cup. A shift in strategy is evident in incidents like the unreserved expulsion of Shadab Khan for backing up too early while a non-striker. Such instances point to the normalisation of several exclusions that were formerly thought to be against the “spirit of cricket.”
Players like Shakib Al Hasan contribute novel elements to the competition. The tournament has more flavour when Shakib defies convention, as was the case with his 2014 incident prior to the Asia Cup. Fans look forward to his challenging their preconceived notions because of this tendency.
Reminders and Presence:
Additionally, the competition serves as a reminder of significant cricket figures. The commemorative supper hosted by the Pakistan Cricket Board serves as a reminder that despite some difficulties, Pakistan is still the official host. Additionally, the presence of famous individuals like Roger Binny, a former all-rounder for India and BCCI president, heightens the significance.
The Asia Cup has its advantages, but there have also been some squandered opportunities. For instance, the organisers could have used the previous BCCI and PCB executives’ expertise in commentary to add fresh viewpoints to the games. Such actions would emphasise the fun in creatively pronouncing names and possibly alter social media hashtags.
In summary, the Asia Cup stands out because of its fierce rivalries, unique tournament format, evolving cricket ethos, creative players, and presence of important figures. These components help to make it an engaging event that receives praise while it is happening rather than after it has passed.